JOHN SINGLETARY, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Ketcher v. Deirdre E. Ketcher, 198 So. 3d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
  …did not authorize the trial court to reconsider the type of alimony [*1064] awarded, and by changing the type of alimony awarded from permanent to dura-tional, the trial court impermissibly exceeded the scope of the mandate. See Brennan v. Brennan, 184 So. 3d 583, 589 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (holding that trial court exceeded the scope of the mandate by reducing duration of alimony award because that issue was affirmed in the original appeal and therefore was law of the case); Ingle v. Ingle, 689 So. 2d 314, 315…
• Jordan v. Jordan, 199 So. 3d 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
  …and liabilities. 127 So. 3d at 796. On remand, the successor trial court carefully determined different values for those assets and liabilities and distributed them to ensure the parties received an appropriate distribution. See Brennan v. Brennan, 184 So. 3d 583, 589-91 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). However, three items need further attention. First, the former husband argues the Lexus lease turn-in fees are marital liabilities that should have been equally distributed. Under section 61.075(3)(c), Florida Statutes,…
• Solomon v. Sofia Vasquez Solomon, 251 So. 3d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
  …h DCA 2004) ). Where a final judgment fails to set forth what steps a parent must take in order to establish unsupervised timesharing, the final judgment must be reversed and remanded for the trial court to identify such steps. Tzynder v. Edelsburg, 184 So. 3d 583, 583 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (reversing and remanding for the trial court to identify the necessary steps for the parent to reestablish unsupervised timesharing with child where the final judgment restricted timesharing to supervised contact one time per…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Washington v. State, 773 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
• Eugene v. State, 792 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
• Pringle v. State, 792 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)