JAMES C. FRAZIER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
JAMES C. FRAZIER, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
184 So. 3d 653
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2016)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004) (reiterating that ha-beas corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions).
OSTERHAUS, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 192 So. 3d 431 (Fla. 2016)…De Mesa v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc./Sedgwick CMS, 187 So. 3d 954 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016); Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Reg'l Transit and Commercial Risk Management, 184 So. 3d 665 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016); Perez v. Univision Network LP/Sentry Claims Service, 184 So. 3d 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016); Weimar v. L’Oreal USA S/D, Inc., 176 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Rankine v. AMR Corp., 176 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Zaldivar v. Prieto, 174 So. 3d 1126 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Gallagher Law Grp., P.A. v. Vic Renovations…
Authorities Cited
- Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004)