MICHAEL JAMES DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL JAMES DAVIS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
185 So. 3d 649
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2016)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Michael Davis’s judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error on the criminal punishment code score-sheet. The trial court calculated Davis to have a total point score of 10.6, but; after adding up the totals for Davis’s primary offense, additional offense, and prior record, the proper total should have been only 9.6., As such, we must remand the matter back to the trial court to file a corrected scoresheet. See Brock v. State, 903 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
Affirmed and remanded.
CASANUEVA and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. State, 205 So. 3d 814 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…er violating his probation by committing a new offense in Arkansas.1 Consequently, the postconviction court erred in dismissing Johnson’s second motion as stating a claim for out-of-state jail credit. A similar situation occurred in James v. State, 185 So. 3d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). [*815] James’s retained counsel filed a rule 3.850 motion that did not contain a proper oath. Id. at 650. The postconviction court struck the motion with leave to amend within sixty days. Id. James’s counsel filed a second motion…
-
Woods v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2020)
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Brock v. State, 903 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)