JACOB ISLA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2016-02-12
No. 5D15-1191
LAWSON, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
185 So. 3d 695 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2016) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Golden v. State, 84 So.3d 396, 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“Assuming arguendo that the trial court properly allowed Golden’s counsel- to adopt'the pro se motion, the effective- date of an adopted pro se motion is the date it is adopted- and not the initial date the unauthorized pleading was filed.”).

LAWSON, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cornelius v. State, 223 So. 3d 398 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
    …leadings, if the trial court permits defense counsel to adopt the pro se pleads ings, the effective date should be the actual date of adoption, not the date on which the unauthorized pleadings were filed.” 955 So. 2d at 1184; see also Isla v. State, 185 So. 3d 695, 695 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (affirming based .on the tenet outlined in Golden, 84 So. 3d at 398); Golden, 84 So. 3d at 398 (“Assuming arguendo that the trial court properly allowed Golden’s counsel to adopt the pro se motion, the effective date of an a…
  • Schiedenhelm v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2021)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw