NATHANIEL J. BROWN, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
NATHANIEL J. BROWN, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
186 So. 3d 625
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2016)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.
. Petitioner is warned that any future pleadings determined by this court to be frivolous.or successive may result in the imposition of sanctions against him, including a prohibition against any further pro se pleadings and a referral to the Florida Department of Corrections for disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department as provided in section 944.279, .Florida Statutes. (2015). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.
ROBERTS, C. J., MAKAR and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. Jones, 229 So. 3d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…filing civil actions for extraordi-. nary writs, directed towards the Florida Department of Corrections and the State of Florida. None of his appeals of the denials of these complaints and petitions were successful in this court. In Brown v. State, 186 So. 3d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), this court denied Mr. Brown’s petition for writ of prohibition on the merits and warned him that future frivolous or successive filings in the court “may result in the imposition of sanctions against him,” including additional l…
-
Brown v. Jones, 221 So. 3d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…e affirmed the circuit court’s order. In light of Mr. Brown’s litigious history in this Court, the previous sanctions imposed by Brown v. State, 35 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), and the warning regarding his subsequent litigation in Brown v. State, 186 So. 3d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), we retained jurisdiction to pursue any additional sanctions against him pursuant to rule 9.410, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and section 944.279, Florida Statutes. See Steele v. State, 998 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 2008); Walker…