MAURICE CAMPBELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2016-01-25
No. 1D15-5084
ROBERTS, C. J., WOLF and THOMAS, JJ., concur. :
186 So. 3d 1061 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2016) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Lee v. State, 939 So.2d 154, 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (holding dismissal without prejudice to refile a facially sufficient motion is a non-appeal-able, non-final order); Williams v. State, 884 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (dismissal without prejudice renders an order non-final and non-appealable).

ROBERTS, C. J., WOLF and THOMAS, JJ., concur. :


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marvine Calloway, 201 So. 3d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …481 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).6 Of course, where the plaintiff is seeking only compensatory damages, it is improper for counsel to argue that the defendant failed to take responsibility for its conduct. See, e.g., State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Gold, 186 So. 3d 1061, 1063-64 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Marotta, 125 So. 3d 956, 959-60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Intramed, Inc. v. Guider, 93 So. 3d 503, 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). This is so because in that situation the closing argument improperly shifts “th…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw