GIOVANNY LLUIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2016-03-16
Nos. 3D15-1150, 3D15-1151, 3D15-1152
Before SUAREZ, C.J., and LAGOA and SALTER, JJ.
187 So. 3d 918 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2016) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
. PER CURIAM.

. PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant s convictions and sentences without prejudice to the defendant filing a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. As the State properly concedes, the written sentences do not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements and the trial court must correct the written sentences pursuant to a Rule 3.800(a) motion.

Affirmed, without prejudice.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Brown v. State, 225 So. 3d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …fficient motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a). See Williams, 957 So. 2d at 601 (“[A] claim asserting a discrepancy between an oral and written sentence is cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) proceeding for correction of an illegal sentence.”); Lluis v. State, 187 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (affirming defendant’s conviction and sentence without prejudice to the filing of a rule 3.800(a) motion where written sentence did not conform to oral pronouncements and stating that “the trial court must correct the written sent…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw