MANUEL NAZARIO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2016-04-15
No. 5D15-2897
SAWAYA, WALLIS, LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
188 So. 3d 975 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2016) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct jail credit from multiple criminal cases originating in Orange County, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. Appellant’s motion did not comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 3.801(c). Despite this deficiency, the trial court denied Appellant’s claim on the merits. When a defendant *976files a facially insufficient Rule 3.801 motion, “the court must enter a non-final, non-appealable order allowing the defendant sixty days to amend the motion.” Adkins v. State, 183 So.3d 1102, 1103 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). We reverse the trial court’s summary denial and remand to provide Appellant sixty days to amend his motion. See Delorenzo v. State, 179 So.3d 550, 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

REVERSED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.

SAWAYA, WALLIS, LAMBERT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw