GRAND RESERVE AT TAMPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., AND BUSINESS LAW GROUP, P.A., APPELLANTS,
v.
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-AF1, APPELLEE
GRAND RESERVE AT TAMPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., AND BUSINESS LAW GROUP, P.A., APPELLANTS,
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-AF1, APPELLEE
189 So. 3d 187
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2016)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the order on appeal in all respects save one. • Upon concession of error by Appellee,- we reverse the imposition of: costs the circuit court awarded .under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2014), as this statute “does not provide a mechanism for recovering , costs.” See Pronman v. Styles, 163 So.3d 535, 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citing Santini v. Cleveland Clinic Fla., 65 So.3d 22, 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)). We remand this case for the court to strike the provision of costs from its order.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
WALLACE, BLACK,'and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. Glass, 219 So. 3d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)…Chase Bank Nat. Ass’n, 79 So. 3d 170, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“[A] party is not permitted to establish the right to maintain an action retroactively by acquiring standing to file a lawsuit after the fact.”); see also Corrigan v. Bank of Am., N.A., 189 So. 3d 187, 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (en banc); Rincon v. Bank of Am., N.A., 206 So. 3d 793, 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Kiefert v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 153 So. 3d 351, 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Green v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 109 So. 3d 1285, 1288 (Fla. 5th D…
-
Johnson v. Deutsche Bank Tr. Co., 248 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
-
Winchel v. Pennymac Corp., 222 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…as the holder of the note—and, hence, its authority to enforce the note in foreclosure—remains unproven, and its complaint untenable,” (citing Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 124 So. 3d 308, 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013))); Corrigan v. Bank of Am., N.A., 189 So. 3d 187, 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (en banc) (“Though Bank of America later filed the original note and mortgage along with an assignment, these documents did not establish standing at the time the original complaint was filed because the endorsement was undat…
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Roberta Santini, M.D. v. Cleveland Clinic Fla., 65 So. 3d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
- Pronman v. Styles, 163 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)