ALEJANDRO HORMAZA AND CELEYNE PORTAL, APPELLANTS,
v.
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
ALEJANDRO HORMAZA AND CELEYNE PORTAL, APPELLANTS,
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
193 So. 3d 24
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2016)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See § 627.409(1), Fla. Stat. (2011); Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins, Co. v. Kramer, 725 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); see also Rappaport v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 972 So.2d 970 (Fla, 8d DCA 2007).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Stahl, 206 So. 3d 124 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…d allowing the State to search Stahl’s phone, the order denying the motion to compel is more akin to [*129] an order suppressing evidence than to an order denying discovery. Cf. State v. Isaac, 696 So. 2d 813, 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); State v. Foley, 193 So. 3d 24, 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). . The trial court’s focus on probable cause was misplaced. The State had a search warrant for the contents of the phone. Stahl has not challenged the validity or execution of that warrant. The only issue before the court was…
-
State v. Milbry, 219 So. 3d 160 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)…charging documents arose from the death of the same child. The motion was denied, prompting the State to seek certiorari review, The first consideration in any certiorari proceeding is whether irreparable harm has been demonstrated. State v. Foley, 193 So. 3d 24, 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Irreparable harm in the criminal context, when the petition is brought by the State, is a unique issue due to the State’s limited ability to appeal. State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 250, 253 (Fla. 1988). Indeed, the State may only…
Authorities Cited
- Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Kramer, 725 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- Armand Rappaport v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 972 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)