RANDOLPH JACKSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2016-07-06
Nos. 1D16-1003, 1D16-1010
WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
194 So. 3d 579 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2016)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the petitioner is barred from future pro se filings in this court concerning specific Alachua County Circuit Court case numbers due to abuse of the legal process.


Facts & Procedural History

The petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus and failed to respond to an order directing him to show cause why he should not be prohibite…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

Due to petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his repeated pro se filings attacking his judgments and sentences in Alachua County Circuit Court ease numbers 01-2003-CF-2475-A and 01-2003-CF-003477-A, this court issued an order directing petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 761 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999). Petitioner has failed to respond.

As such, because petitioner’s continued and repeated attacks on his conviction and sentence have become an abuse of the legal process, we hold that he is barred from future pro se filings in this court concerning Alachua County Circuit Court case numbers 01-2003-CF-2475-A and 01-2003-CF-003477-A. The Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any future filings concerning these cases unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. Petitioner is warned that any filings that violate the terms of this opinion may result in a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2015). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw