DFRP NOTE PURCHASE PARTNERS I, LP, APPELLANT,
v.
GERALD BRUNO, WILLIAM M. HARNELL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, CASCADES AT ST. LUCIE WEST RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION, INC., MOSS AND ASSOCIATES, LLC, UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF GERALD BRUNO, UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF WILLIAM M. HARNELL, JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE AS UNKNOWN TENANTS IN POSSESSION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in granting involuntary dismissal based on an affidavit purporting to satisfy the mortgage, and that the issue of whether the satisfaction was a mistake should be tried.
In a mortgage foreclosure action, the defendant presented an affirmative defense that the mortgage was satisfied based on a recorded affidavit introdu…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Involuntary Dismissal cases and more on FLexlaw
In this mortgage foreclosure action, the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for involuntary dismissal. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(b). The court gave credence to the defendant’s affirmative defense. that the mortgage had been satisfied, based on a recorded affidavit introduced during the plaintiffs case. We reverse and remand for trial of the affirmative defense.
On a motion for involuntary dismissal, the trial court may not weigh the evidence, but must view it “in the light most favorable to [the nonmoving party].” Miller v. Nifakos, 655 So.2d 192, 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). See also McCabe v. Hanley, 886 So.2d 1053, 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). “An involuntary dismissal or directed verdict is properly entered only when the evidence considered in the light most favorable to the non-moving party fails to establish a prima facie case on the non-moving party’s claim.” McCabe, 886 So.2d at 1055 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Here, the plaintiff presented a prima facie case to foreclose the mortgage. See Bank of Am., N.A. v. Delgado, 166 So.3d 857, 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).
On the trial of the affirmative defense that the mortgage had been satisfied, the circuit court shall determine whether the document purporting to satisfy the mortgage was in error. See Azar v. Steiner, 142 Fla. 748, 196 So. 293 (1940). “A court may apply equitable principles to reverse the cancellation of a mortgage satisfaction when that satisfaction is the result of mistake or inadvertence.” All Real Estate Title Servs., Inc. v. Minqh Quang Vuu, 67 So.3d 260, 262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).
On another point on appeal, we hold that the recorded affidavit was properly admitted into evidence.
Reversed and remanded.
GROSS, KLINGENSMITH, JJ., and LINDSEY, NORMA S„ Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Citigroup Mortg. Loan Tr. v. Scialabba, 238 So. 3d 317 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
-
Rushmore Loan Mgmt. Servs., LLC v. Kavoll (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
-
Rushmore Loan Mgmt. Servs., LLC v. Kavoll (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
Authorities Cited
- McCABE v. Hanley, 886 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
- Miller v. Nifakos, 655 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
- Bank OF Am., N.A. v. Delgado, 166 So. 3d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
- Russo v. State, 142 Fla. 596 (Fla. 1940)
- Ogden v. State, 166 So. 3d 857 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
- Rhodes v. State, 655 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
- Azar v. Steiner, 142 Fla. 748 (Fla. 1940)
- ALL Real Est. Title Servs., Inc. v. Minqh Quang VUU and Hanh Luu Vuu, 67 So. 3d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)