JOHN CIROTA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2016-07-13
No. 1D16-377
RAY, MAKAR and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
197 So. 3d 92 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2016)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court’s denial of John Cirota’s motion as untimely and successive, the latest in a string of seven meritless appearances in this Court, each challenging his conviction and sentence, often on the same grounds. We caution Cirota that “additional frivolous postcon-viction appeals or petitions may result in an order barring him from further pro se filings in this court pertaining to his [2011] conviction.” See Carroll v. State, 192 So.3d 525 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

AFFIRMED.

RAY, MAKAR and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw