JOE LOVE, DOC# D12525, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Winchel v. Pennymac Corp., 222 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
  …see also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110(d) (requiring that affirmative defenses be pleaded in the answer). Yet once injected into a case by a defendant’s pleading, we say that it must be proved at trial by the plaintiff. See Dickson v. Roseville Props., LLC, 198 So. 3d 48, 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); May v. PHH Mortg. Corp., 150 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). Once put at issue by a defendant, then, standing becomes a part of the prima facie case that a foreclosure plaintiff must prove in order to secure a judgment. S…
• Ventures Tr. 2013-I-H-R v. Asset Acquisitions & Holdings Tr., 202 So. 3d 939 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …he time of filing”—-by which, we glean from the court's various pronouncements at the conclusion of the proceedings, the court meant the time that the amended complaint was filed. . See Corrigan, 189 So. 3d at 189; Dickson v. Roseville Props., LLC, 198 So. 3d 48, 50-51 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ("For better or for worse, it is settled that it is not enough for the plaintiff to prove that it has standing when the case is tried; it must also prove that it had standing when the complaint was filed.”). Moreover, whate…
• Stoltz v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 194 So. 3d 1097 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …SALARIO, Judge. We are again required to reverse a final judgment of foreclosure because of the plaintiffs failure to prove at trial the existence of standing at inception of the case. See Dickson v. Roseville Props., LLC, 198 So. 3d 48, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D2520, 2015 WL 6777155 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 6, 2015) (“For better or for worse, it is settled that it is not enough for the plaintiff to prove that it has standing when the case is tried; it must also prove that it had standing when…

Authorities Cited

• Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)