ANTONIO JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied the motion to enforce mandate and issued an order to show cause why the appellant should not be prohibited from filing further pro se pleadings and sanctioned.
[1] A court may issue an order to show cause why a party should not be prohibited from filing further pro se pleadings and sanctioned for filing numerous, repetitious, mislea…
[2] A motion to enforce a mandate will be denied if the court issued no such mandate.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAntonio Johnson, serving a life sentence, filed a motion requesting the court to enforce a mandate that the court states it never issued. Johnson is d…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Writ Of Quo Warranto cases and more on FLexlaw
On Motion to Enforce Mandate
Antonio Johnson, who is serving a life sentence, and a “frequent flyer” with extensive mileage in this Court and the circuit court, filed the instant motion requesting this Court to enforce its August 4, 2010 mandate “vacating the trial court’s order and ... reversing] with directions to re-sentence Appellant de novo or hold an evidentiary hearing.” Because this Court issued no such mandate, we deny Johnson’s motion, and in light of the numerous, repetitious, misleading, , and frivolous pleadings Johnson has filed with this Court, we issue the following order to show cause.
The appellant, Antonio Johnson, is ordered to show cause within thirty (30) days: (1) why he should not be prohibited from filing further pro se pleadings with this Court concerning his July 16, 1998 conviction for armed robbery in case number 97-32329, see Johnson v. State, 744 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), and (2) why this Court should not sanction appellant pursuant to sections 944,279 and 944.28(2)(a) of the Florida Statutes (2010).1
Denied; show cause order issued.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited (13 total)
- Johnson v. State, 898 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
- Johnson v. State, 239 So. 3d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
- Williams v. State, 897 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
- Jackson v. State, 917 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- IM v. State, 995 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
- Johnson v. Crosby, 905 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
- Johnson v. State, 932 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- Johnson v. State, 932 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- Millon AIR, Inc. v. Carlos Zambrano Ferrin and/or Personal Representative of the Estate of Alba Lucia Ferrin Gilel, 744 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- Johnson v. State, 744 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)