DANTE RASHAD MORRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the judgments and sentences but remanded for correction of the cost order.
Appellant was convicted of attempted felony murder and attempted armed robbery. The trial court entered an order correcting sentencing error regarding…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Written Opinion cases and more on FLexlaw
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
Appellant’s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc is denied; the motion for written opinion is granted. The prior opinion dated July 29, 2016, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is issued in its place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.
Dante Rashad Morris appeals his judgments and sentences for attempted felony murder and attempted armed robbery. We affirm Mr. Morris’s judgments without comment. We also affirm his sentences, but we remand his case for the trial court to enter a correct order on the costs Mr. Morris is required to pay.
Pursuant to a motion to correct sentencing error, see Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b), the trial court entered an order directing that the cost of prosecution was limited to $100 and that any Florida Department of Corrections (FDOC) supervision costs should be stricken because Mr. Morris was not placed on supervision. However, as Mr. Morris argues, and the State correctly concedes, the amended costs order that was subsequently filed still obligates him to pay $100 for the “Additional” cost of prosecution and to pay the FDOC costs.
In denying Mr. Morris’ rule 3.800(b) motion, the trial court also rejected Mr. Morris’ argument that pursuant to Henry v. State, 175 So.3d 675 (Fla. 2015), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1455, 194 L.Ed.2d 552 (2016), he was entitled to resentencing under the framework established by chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida. We affirm that aspect of the trial court’s order on the authority of this court’s decision in Williams v. State, 197 So.3d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). But see *155Peterson v. State, 193 So.3d 1034 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).
Judgments and sentences affirmed; remanded for trial court to file corrected cost order.
CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dante Rashad Morris v. State, 246 So. 3d 244 (Fla. 2018)…fifteen years old at the time of his crimes, challenges his concurrent sentences of thirty years' imprisonment and fifteen years' imprisonment for the crimes of attempted felony murder and attempted armed robbery, respectively. See Morris v. State , 206 So. 3d 154, 154 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). Although Morris committed his crimes in 2012, before the enactment of chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, he was sentenced in 2014, after the statute was enacted. However, by its own terms, chapter 2014-220 does not apply to…
Authorities Cited
- Leighdon Henry v. State, 175 So. 3d 675 (Fla. 2015)
- Peterson v. State, 193 So. 3d 1034 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
- Williams v. State, 197 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
- Florida v. Leighdon Henry., 136 S. Ct. 1455 (U.S. 2016)
- Fromal v. Sink., 136 S. Ct. 1455 (U.S. 2016)