ZACHARY N. LINVILLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ZACHARY N. LINVILLE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
207 So. 3d 379
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2016)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
The State properly concedes that Zachary N. Linville’s motion for return of personal property was legally sufficient. We agree and reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Bolden v. State, 875 So.2d 780, 782-83 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (noting that if motion for return of personal property is facially sufficient, trial court may order State to respond to motion or hold an evidentiary hearing).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Whittaker v. State, 223 So. 3d 270 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)…rol or may place the probationer into community control as provided in this section. § 948.06(8)(e), Fla. Stat. (2015) (emphasis added). “[T]he written findings requirement of section 948.06(8)(e) is mandatory, not discretionary.” Barber v. State, 207 So. 3d 379, 384 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). “The statute provides that there are a number of factors the trial court should consider in making the dangerousness determination, [*274] and that decision must be based on one or more of them.” Id... Nonetheless, because…
-
State v. Rincon, 273 So. 3d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
-
Moore v. State, 268 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Deatrick S. Bolden v. State, 875 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)