J.P., THE FATHER, AND E.R., THE MOTHER, APPELLANTS,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2017-01-25
Nos. 3D16-2152 & 3D16-1977
Before SUAREZ, C.J. and LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.
208 So. 3d 1258 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2017) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Both E.R., the mother, and J.P., the father, appeal the trial court’s detailed order adjudicating the couple’s infant son dependent. We consolidated the two appeals. We affirm because the order is supported by competent, substantial evidenced adduced at the two-day dependency hearing.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Walsh v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 380 So. 3d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
    …to consider in determining the best interest of the child, including the continuity of placement. The parent’s right to designate placement was only one of multiple factors for the trial court’s consideration. See E.Q. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 208 So. 3d 1258, 1260 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“[T]he wishes of the parents are a factor, but those wishes must be considered with the other three [now seven] factors, which relate to a determination of what is in the best interest of the child.”). The amended version…
  • Y.G. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 246 So. 3d 509 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
  • J.G. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 270 So. 3d 523 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw