ST. JOHNS RIVER LINE CO.
v.
J. PHILLIP DOSS, JR.
ST. JOHNS RIVER LINE CO.
J. PHILLIP DOSS, JR.
113 Fla. 377
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 151 So. 710
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Esch v. Davis Forster, 123 Fla. 905 (Fla. 1936)…fficiently set out and discussed in Esch, et al., v. Forster, et al., 99 Fla. 717, 127 So. 336; New Smyrna Inlet District, et al., v. Esch, et al., 103 Fla. 24, 137 So. 1 (rehearing denied, 103 Fla. 31, 138 So. 49); Forster, et al., v. Esch, et al., 113 Fla. 377, 152 So. 444. Upon final hearing, .Honorable M. D. Smith, as specially designated chancellor to hear said case in the place of the resident judge of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, ordered certain specified payment…
-
Gulf Life Ins. Co. v. Hillsborough Cnty., 129 Fla. 98 (Fla. 1935)…ase where a debt limit or an organic inhibition on the County is involved. It is a case where County officers acted pursuant to a statute subsequently held to be invalid. The law affords protection to those relying on such statutes. Forster v. Esch, 113 Fla. 377, 152 So. 444; Harwell v. Hillsborough County, supra. [*104] But appellee contends that even though appellant has a right of action against Hillsborough County it is now barred by Paragraph 5 of Section 2939, Revised General Statutes of 1920, Section…
-
Miami Bridge Co. v. THE Miami Beach Ry. Co., 152 Fla. 458 (Fla. 1943)…rable assistance to the bench and bar in future cases: “As suggested in the committee’s note, this section is intended to follow the code practice of motion for judgment on the pleadings, and to have the effect of a demurrer at law. Foster v. Esch, 113 Fla. 377, 152 So. 444, citing this annotation. “It cannot be considered as the exact equivalent of the hearing on bill and answer under the old chancery practice. The old answer in chancery was more than a pleading which stated the defendant’s defense; it w…