FRANCIS CARROLL RUEDIGER, APPELLANT,
v.
IRIS GAY RUEDIGER, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1959-05-19
No. B-102
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., J., and FUSSELL, CARROLL W., Associate Judge, concur.
112 So. 2d 268 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by the learned circuit judge in his order.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., J., and FUSSELL, CARROLL W., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Indus. Affiliates, Ltd. v. Testa, 770 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
    …Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2540, at 368 (2d ed. 1995) (construing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b)).1 The landlord argues that under Philpot v. Bouchelle, 411 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and City of Miami v. Lewis, 112 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), all that is necessary to preserve the issue for appellate review is to move for a directed verdict during trial. See 411 So. 2d at 1342, 112 So. 2d at 269. But those cases do not specifically address whether it is necessary to re…
  • Rabell v. City OF Miami, 417 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Evans v. Southern Holding Corp., 391 So .2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); City of Miami v. Lewis, 112 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959); Section 2-96.1, Code of Metropolitan Dade County.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw