JOSE CRUZ, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the pro se litigant failed to show good cause why he should not be prohibited from further filings related to a specific case.
The pro se litigant, Jose Cruz, attempted to seek review of a sentence in a prior case. The court denied his most recent attempt and ordered him to sh…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Show Cause Order cases and more on FLexlaw
ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On October 13, 2016, this court denied Jose Cruz’s most recent attempt to seek review of the sentence entered below in lower court case number 92-20576A, at the same time ordering Cruz to show cause why he should not be prohibited from any further pro se appeals, pleadings, motions or petitions dealing with Case No. 92-20576A. Cruz responded to the show cause order, but has not shown good reason for not being prohibited from further pro se filings.1
Accordingly, we direct the Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal to refuse to accept for filing in this court any further appeals, petitions or motions relating to Cruz’s conviction and sentence in Case No. 92-20576A, unless they are filed by a Florida Bar member in good standing. Any such further unauthorized pro se filings by Cruz will subject him to sanctions, including the issuance of written findings forwarded to the Florida Department of Corrections for consideration by it of disciplinary action. See 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2016).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- C.M. and F.M. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 981 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)