PATRICK DUNCAN GAMMAGE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2016-09-02
No. 2D14-3898
MORRIS, KHOUZAM and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
210 So. 3d 97 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2016) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Topics
Motion To Enforce Mandate Third Degree Felony Lesser Included Offense

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Enforce Mandate cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

ORDER ON MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Gammage filed a motion to enforce mandate, claiming that the trial court did not comply with the directions in this court’s opinion in Gammage v. State, 181 So.3d 1256 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). He contends that the trial court did not enter judgments for and resentence him *98on the lesser included offenses of attempted tampering with jurors as first-degree misdemeanors as required by this court’s opinion. We deny the motion to enforce mandate because this court remanded for entry of judgments for the lesser included offenses of attempted tampering and for resentencing and the trial court complied with our mandate. We clarify that the offense of attempted tampering with jurors is a third-degree felony. See § 777.04(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013) (providing that “if the offense attempted ... is a ... [fjelony of the third degree ranked in level 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023, the offense of criminal attempt ... is a felony of the third degree”); § 921.0022(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013) (ranking the third-degree felony of tampering with jurors under section 918.12, Florida Statutes, as a level 4 offense).

MORRIS, KHOUZAM and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Russ v. State, 230 So. 3d 510 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
    …denial of his motion to suppress the evidence. However, because “there was neither a stipulation nor a determination by the .trial court that the denial of the motion to suppress was dispositive,” we affirm without further comment. Ferran v. State, 210 So. 3d 97, 97 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (per curiam); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Fla Stat. § 924.051(4) (2015); Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114, 119 (Fla. 2000) (holding that when the [district] court determines that an appeal does not present ...…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw