IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF BEVERLY ANN STRAITZ, A MINOR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An attorney appealed an order denying his motion to vacate a guardianship discharge order, claiming he was entitled to attorney's fees. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the attorney should have appealed the original discharge order within 60 days rather than filing a motion to vacate after that period expired.
The court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the order denying the motion to vacate was not itself a final order, and the proper procedure was to appeal the final discharge order within 60 days of its entry. Filing a motion to vacate after the appeal period has expired does not circumvent the jurisdictional requirement.
“Appeals from the County Judge's Courts when same concern the estates and interests of minors may only be taken from final orders or decrees.”
Establishes the jurisdictional requirement that appeals must be from final orders in guardianship matters
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellant, G. H. Martin, rendered legal services to a guardian and ward in a guardianship proceeding and petitioned for attorney's fees under Flor…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse County Judge's Court cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate, which order was entered on August 23, 1957, by the County Judge’s Court of Broward County, Florida, in a guardianship proceeding.
Appellant rendered legal services to the guardian and ward and thereafter petitioned the County Judge’s Court for an order *890making an allowance for attorney’s fees as he was entitled to do under the provisions of F.S.A. § 745.33. On April 15, 1957, while appellant’s petition for fees was pending, the County Judge entered a final order discharging the guardian and, in effect, closing the case. The pertinent parts of the order are as follows:
“It is ordered and adjudged that the petition for payment of fees to G. H. Martin, Esquire, is hereby certified to the County Judge’s Court in and for Highlands County, Florida, for such disposition as to that Court shall seem meet and proper.
“It is further ordered and adjudged that Fred Zimmerman be, and is hereby, discharged, as guardian of the property of Beverly Ann Straitz, from further liability in connection with said guardianship, and that Peerless Casualty Company, surety on said bond are likewise relieved from further liability as such surety, according to law.”
On August 1, 1957, appellant filed his motion to vacate the order of discharge. On August 23, 1957, the court below entered the order which is now on appeal. After making extensive findings the order concluded, as follows:
“It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the County Judge’s Court of Broward County, Florida, does not have jurisdiction of the minor, Beverly Ann Straitz, her Guardian, Laura Straitz, nor the property of said Beverly Ann Straitz, minor.
“It is further ordered and adjudged that the Motion to Vacate filed herein on August 1, 1957, be, and it is hereby denied.
“It is further ordered and adjudged that certified copies of the Motion to Vacate Order, and this order be mailed to the Hon. Mervin Rehrer, County Judge of Highlands County.”
In view of these circumstances the appeal should be dismissed for that this Court does not have jurisdiction. The order assailed by appellant is not a final order or decree. Appeals from the County Judge’s Courts when same concern the estates and interests of minors may only be taken from final orders or decrees. Art. 5, § 5(3), Fla.Const., adopted general election 1956, F.S.A. See also Rule 4.4, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.
The order discharging the guardian entered on April 15, 1957, was a final order. Redfern, Wills and Administration of Estates in Florida, 3rd Ed., § 353. If appellant was aggrieved thereby it was incumbent upon him to appeal from such final order within 60 days. Rule 3.2, subd. b,. Florida Appellate Rules. Such procedure may not be circumvented by filing a motion to vacate after the appeal time has expired.
The appeal is hereby dismissed.
KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
SUN Bank & Tr. Co. v. Jones, 645 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…an order of discharge. Fla.Prob.R. 5.680(g). See, e.g., Midland National Bank & Trust v. Comerica Trust Co., 616 So. 2d 1081, 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); In re Estate of Dobbins, 215 So. 2d 312, 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968); In re Guardianship of Straitz, 112 So. 2d 889, 890 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959). However, guardianship proceedings are governed by the Florida Probate Rules. See In re Guardianship of Anderson, 568 So. 2d 958, 958 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); McGinnis. Rule 5.100 provides: All orders and judgments of the court…
-
In re Est. of Leonard D. Leterman, 238 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)…161 So. 2d 538 (order admitting a will to probate); In re Estate of Rogers, Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 741 (order assigning dower). In the following cases, the orders appealed were held to be interlocutory: In re Guardianship of Straitz, Fla.App.1959, 112 So. 2d 889 (order denying a motion to vacate an order discharging a guardian); In re Maxcy’s Estate, Fla.App.1964, 165 So. 2d 446 (order denying a petition to remove a co-administrator) ; In re Estate of Rogers, Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 741 (order recognizing…
-
In re Est. of William Straitz v. Straitz, 135 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)…ney’s fees to the County Judge’s Court of Highlands County. He subsequently filed a motion to vacate this order which the court denied. He appealed from the latter order which was dismissed by this court, In re Guardianship of Straitz, Fla.App.1959, 112 So. 2d 889. The attorney then appealed from the former order, but not within the time provided by law and this appeal was dismissed by this court, In re Guardianship of Straitz, Fla.App.1961, 129 So. 2d 161. The Attorney then filed a petition for writ of certi…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence