WILLIAM KIRK ANDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2017-03-10
Nos. CASE NO. 1D16-4656; 1D16-4657
WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
211 So. 3d 374 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2017)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte consolidate these appeals for disposition. Appellant seeks review of orders revoking his probation and sentencing him to prison. He argues in each case and the state properly concedes that by failing to conduct an appropriate plea colloquy before revoking appellant’s probation and sentencing him, the trial court reversibly erred and violated the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c). See Haug v. State, 151 So.3d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Accordingly, we REVERSE the orders revoking probation and the judgments and sentences entered thereon, and REMAND for further proceedings.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw