HERNANDO INVESTMENT CO., APPELLANT,
v.
IRENE KILPATRICK, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 1959-05-20
No. 1182
112 So. 2d 923 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Atkins v. Greenhut Constr. Co., 447 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
    …rther, TTD benefits for a period of recuperation following a curative surgical procedure necessitated by a compensable injury are properly awardable, Smitty’s Coffee Shop v. Florida Industrial Commission, 86 So. 2d 268 (Fla.1956); Chapel v. Broward, 112 So. 2d 923 (Fla.App.1959). On remand, further proceedings should be conducted to include the determination of the point in time Atkins’ temporary disability began; the period of time Atkins’ temporary disability extended; and the point in time Atkins thereafte…
  • Clyatt Mem'l, Inc. v. Havina Scott, 394 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
    …ize that a finding of MMI (and an award of PPD benefits) does not always preclude a later award of TTD benefits. See, e. g., Smitty’s Coffee Shop v. Florida Industrial Com’n, 86 So. 2d 268 (Fla.1956); Chapel v. Broward, 3 FCR 421 (1959), cert. den., 112 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959). (Both decisions upheld awards of TTD benefits after findings of MMI and awards of PPD benefits had been made.) But unlike either Smitty’s Coffee Shop or Chapel, this case does not involve an award of TTD benefits for a period of…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw