STEVEN VANDESANDE, APPELLANT,
v.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE
STEVEN VANDESANDE, APPELLANT,
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE
211 So. 3d 1086
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2017)
Positive Treatment
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s entry of summary judgment on Count I of Appellant Steven Vandesande’s Third Amended Complaint. Peeples v. Peeples, 871 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (barring former husband’s supplemental petition on the basis of res judicata).
We also affirm the trial court’s directed verdict on the remaining counts of Vande-sande’s Third Amended Complaint. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that “[wjithout a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Peeples v. Lemuel C. Peeples, Jr., 871 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)