HERMAN P. MAESTAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HERMAN P. MAESTAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
212 So. 3d 391
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2017)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation as supported by competent evidence showing his willful and substantial violations. We also agree with the State’s concession of error, and remand for entry of a written order specifying each condition of probation the appellant violated. See Oertel v. State, 82 So.3d 152, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Robinson v. State, 74 So.3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“Even though the record is clear, a formal, written order specifying each condition of probation violated must be entered in this case.”); King v. State, 46 So.3d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
Revocation affirmed, but remanded for entry of revocation order consistent with this opinion.
Levine, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shalamoff v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)…ected on remand to reflect a hearing. See Broyes, 382 So. 3d at 734. Thus, we affirm the revocation of probation and the resulting sentences except for the correction of the disposition orders and scoresheet as directed above. See Maestas v. State, 212 So. 3d 391, 392 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (revocation affirmed but remanded for entry of written revocation order specifying each condition of probation violated). The defendant need not be present for issuance of a written order specifying the probation conditions…
-
Shalamoff v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)…ected on remand to reflect a hearing. See Broyes, 382 So. 3d at 734. Thus, we affirm the revocation of probation and the resulting sentences except for the correction of the disposition orders and scoresheet as directed above. See Maestas v. State, 212 So. 3d 391, 392 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (revocation affirmed but remanded for entry of written revocation order specifying each condition of probation violated). The defendant need not be present for issuance of a written order specifying the probation conditions…
Authorities Cited
- Robinson v. State, 74 So. 3d 570 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
- Ira C. King, III v. State, 46 So. 3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
- Oertel v. State, 82 So. 3d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)