SCHEUER

v.

TURCHIN

Citator

Cited By

• Spataro v. State, 179 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
  …closure is not required. United States v. Ventresca, 1965, 380 U.S. 102, 85 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684; Rugendorf v. United States, supra; Ferrara v. State, Fla.1958, 101 So. 2d 797; Harrington v. State, Fla.App.1959, 110 So. 2d 495, appeal dismissed 113 So. 2d 231; Anno: 76 A.L.R. 2d 262 (1961). Compare the foregoing cases with Aguilar v. State of Texas, supra. The defendant’s last contention is that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to require a prosecution witness to divulge the name of…
• State v. Hardy, 114 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)
  …ailing and better rule in both federal and state courts in this country. This Court recently had occasion to pass upon the question involved here. In Harrington v. State, Fla.App., 110 So. 2d 495, 497 (appeal dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court, 113 So. 2d 231), the appellant had been convicted of the offense of aiding and assisting in the setting up, promotion, and conducting of a lottery. At the trial certain lottery paraphernalia, seized under a search warrant, was admitted in evidence over appellant’s…
• State v. Lewis, 225 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
  …reverse. Before comparing these cases with the instant case, we note that an affidavit based upon information received from a reliable confidential informant is proper. Harrington v. State, Fla.App.1959, 110 So. 2d 495, appeal dismissed, Fla. 1959, 113 So. 2d 231. In fact, such an affidavit need not even allege that the informant is a reliable source. Ludwig v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 215 So. 2d 898. In the present case the af-fiant did allege the reliability of the informant and tendered this as the factual b…

Authorities Cited

• State of Fla. ex rel. Oliver Folmar v. Maloney, 105 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)