FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2017-04-05

No. 3D15-2339

Before ROTHENBERG, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

215 So. 3d 194 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2017) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

LOGUE, J.

Any error by the trial court in admitting the hearsay statements at issue was, at best, harmless. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2015) (“No judgment shall be set aside or reversed ... on the ground of ... the improper admission or rejection of evidence ... unless in the opinion of the court to which application is made, after an examination of the entire case it shall appear that the error complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.”).

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Rodriguez v. State, 248 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. 2018)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE