ALTON D. ROLLINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2017-04-12
No. 4D16-3811
Gross, Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
216 So. 3d 644 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2017) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Davis v. State, 199 So.3d 546, 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). Cf. Kelsey v. State, 206 So.3d 5, 6 (Fla. 2016) (answering the following certified question, “Is a defendant whose original sentence violated Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), and who was subsequently resentenced prior to July 1, 2014, entitled to be resentenced pursuant to the provisions of chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida,” in the affirmative).

Gross, Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Donovan Jonathan Tillman v. State, 247 So. 3d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)
    …to the enactment of Chapter 2014-220, which revamped juvenile sentencing but expressly made the law prospective. We have already decided this issue against his position in Davis v. State, 199 So. 3d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) ; see alsoRollins v. State,216 So. 3d 644 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). We certify the same question as we certified in Davis: DO THE SENTENCE REVIEW PROVISIONS ENACTED IN CHAPTER 2014-220, LAWS OF FLORIDA, APPLY TO ALL JUVENILE OFFENDERS WHOSE SENTENCES EXCEED THE STATUTORY THRESHOLDS, EVEN THOSE…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw