MARION CARTER, APPELLANT,
v.
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEE
Affirmed.
KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN, J., concur.
WALDEN, JAMES H., Associate Judge, dissents.
(dissenting).
I dissent for that I strongly believe that the case should have been submitted to the jury in the court below by authority of the cases of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Johnston, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 689 ; Hutton v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, Fla.1957, 92 So.2d 528; and Atlantic and St. Andrews Bay Ry. Co. v. Church, 212 F.2d 688. It is my view, therefore, that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
(dissenting).
I dissent for that I strongly believe that the case should have been submitted to the jury in the court below by authority of the cases of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Johnston, Fla.1954, 74 So. 2d 689 ; Hutton v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, Fla.1957, 92 So. 2d 528; and Atlantic and St. Andrews Bay Ry. Co. v. Church, 212 F. 2d 688. It is my view, therefore, that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carter v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co., 115 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 1959)…Certiorari denied without opinion. 113 So. 2d 412.…
Authorities Cited
- Atlanta & ST. Andrews Bay Ry. Co., Inc. v. Church (two cases), 212 F.2d 688 (5th Cir. 1954)
- Hutton v. Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co., 92 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 1957)
- Atl. Coast Line R. Co. v. Johnston (two cases), 74 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 1954)