MICHAEL JOE MCCOY, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
MICHAEL JOE MCCOY, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
219 So. 3d 63
Florida Supreme Court (2017)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in McCoy v. State, 194 So.3d 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), which was certified to be in direct conflict with the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Thomas v. State, 91 So.3d 880 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012), See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Having considered the First District’s opinion and the briefs of the parties, upon further review, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review.
It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Adventist Health System/sunbelt, Inc. v. Machalek, 48 Fla. L. Weekly S150 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…3, Fla. Const.; art. III, § 1, Fla. Const. It is the Legislature’s task to decide whether a medical malpractice crisis exists, whether a medical malpractice crisis has abated, and whether the Florida Statutes should be amended accordingly. Kalitan, 219 So. 3d 63 (Polston, J., dissenting). Over time, it appears the courts have not focused on the statutory text and have instead rewritten it, a clear violation of the separation of powers. See Westpark Preserve Homeowners Ass’n, Inc. v. Pulte Home Corp., 365 S…
Authorities Cited
- Devore L. Thomas v. State, 91 So. 3d 880 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)
- McCOY v. State, 194 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)