PAULINE BRAUNSTEIN, APPELLANT,
v.
SILHOUETTE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1959-07-03
No. 892
ALLEN, C. J., and KANNER and SHANNON, JJ., -concur. ■
113 So. 2d 436 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the appellant has failed to comply with the provisions of Florida Appellate Rule 3.2(b), 31 F.S.A., it is, upon consideration

Ordered by the Court sua sponte that the appeal in this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed.

ALLEN, C. J., and KANNER and SHANNON, JJ., -concur. ■


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …Hansen, Fla.1961, 133 So. 2d 73; Ramagli Realty Co. v. Craver, Fla.1960, 121 So. 2d 648; Albert v. Carey, Fla.App.1960, 120 So. 2d 189; Dunham v. Pan American Bank of Miami, Fla.App.1960, 118 So. 2d 264; Braunstein v. Silhouette, Inc., Fla.App.1959, 113 So. 2d 436; Harris v. Condermann, Fla.App.1959, 113 So. 2d 235. KANNER, Acting C. J.,- and WHITE and SMITH, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw