CHRISTOPHER ROUNDTREE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Double Jeopardy Principles cases and more on FLexlaw
The Defendant, Christopher Roundtree, was convicted of criminal mischief, burglary of a dwelling, petit theft, grand theft of a motor vehicle, dealing in stolen property, and failing to appear. He raises two issues on appeal and we affirm with one exception.
He argues that the court erred in adjudicating and sentencing him for both petit theft and dealing in stolen property. The State properly conceded error on this issue.
While a defendant may be charged with both theft and dealing in stolen property when relating to the same property, he cannot be convicted of both crimes. § 812.025, Fla. Stat. (2012); Goddard v. State, 458 So.2d 230, 233 (Fla. 1984). Accordingly, we reverse the Defendant’s conviction for petit theft and otherwise affirm his convictions.
Reversed in part; and affirmed in part.
Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (28 total)
-
Madl v. Wells Fargo Bank, 244 So. 3d 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)…to section 57.105(7), the moving party must prove three requirements: 1) the contract provides for prevailing party fees, 2) both the movant and opponent are parties to that contract, and 3) the movant prevailed. See Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. Glass , 219 So. 3d 896, 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (en banc); Fla. Cmty. Bank , 197 So. 3d at 1115. First, as noted above, the [*1139] Appellants' mortgage contains the prevailing party fee provisions. Second, by virtue of the assignment and the indorsement, Appellee joined…
-
Torres v. The Bank of N.Y., 252 So. 3d 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
-
Sabido v. The Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 238 So. 3d 867 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
Previewing 3 of 28 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Goddard v. State, 458 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1984)