CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL STECKLOFF, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE, AND DIANE STECKLOFF, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1959-06-30
No. 59-261
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
113 So. 2d 446 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1959) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bay Shore v. Steckloff, Fla.App.1958, 107 So.2d 171; City of Miami v. Steckloff, Fla.1959, 111 So.2d 446.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • ….S.A. They rely upon the following authority for reversal: Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. Walker, 151 Fla. 314, 9 So. 2d 361. In response, the appellee relies heavily upon the opinion of this court in Sarkady v. McGuire, Fla.App.1959, 113 So. 2d 446, which held in effect that the action of a second mortgagee against the holder of a purchase money first mortgage and the mortgagors thereof was required to urge a fraud action by a compulsory counterclaim in the mortgage foreclosure action. If the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw