SHANE MCMINN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2017-05-31
No. Case No. 2D16-5330
LaROSE, CRENSHAW, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
219 So. 3d 974 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2017) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lindquist v. State, 155 So.3d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Durant v. State, 177 So.3d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (en banc); Walden v. State, 112 So.3d 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Thomas v. State, 828 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

LaROSE, CRENSHAW, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. S. G. (Fla. 6th DCA 2024)
    …tiorari.” State v. D.H., 123 So. 3d 1175, 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). However, if the order under review stems from a motion to suppress, the Fourth District has held that jurisdiction lies pursuant to Rule 9.145(c)(1)(B). See, e.g., State v. C.J., 219 So. 3d 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). The Fifth District has interpreted State v. Palmore to hold that the content of the order, rather than its title, determines its appealability. See State v. Katiba, 502 So. 2d 1274, 1274 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (“Nevertheless, the…
  • State v. Rayne Burnett Crume (Fla. 6th DCA 2024)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw