DENNIS B. STITZEL AND PATRICIA O. STITZEL, PETITIONERS,
v.
CHAM-CAP, INC., RESPONDENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 2017-06-23
No. Case No. 5D17-1674
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
219 So. 3d 1036 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2017)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the motion to disqualify the trial judge was legally sufficient, requiring disqualification.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioners sought to disqualify the trial judge, but their motion was denied. They contend the denial was erroneous.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Dennis and Patricia Stitzel seek a writ of prohibition challenging the denial of their motion to disqualify the trial judge. The Stitzels contend that the trial judge erred by denying their legally sufficient motion. We agree.

Our opinion in Shuler v. Green Mountain Ventures, Inc., 791 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), controls the disposition of this case. In Shuler, we stated:

A motion to disqualify is legally sufficient if the facts alleged, ássumed to be true, would cause a reasonable person to have a well-founded fear that he or she will not receive a fair trial from the assigned judge. State v. Shaw, 643 So.2d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). The fear of judicial bias must be objectively reasonable. Id. The subjective fear of a party seeking the disqualification of a judge is not sufficient. Kowalski v. Boyles, 557 So.2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Rather, the facts and reasons given for the disqualification of a judge must tend to show personal bias or prejudice. Levine v. State, 650 So.2d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

791 So.2d at 1215. Applying this standard, the allegations made in the Stitzels’ motion to disqualify the trial judge, are legally sufficient.

PROHIBITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw