THEODORE ROOSEVELT FOULKES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Theodore Foulkes entered a no contest plea to possession of cannabis in excess of twenty grams after the denial of his dis-positive motion'to suppress. We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s denial of Foulkes’motion to suppress. However, we agree with Foulkes that the trial court erred in imposing costs of investigation where the State did not expressly request these costs, On remand, the State shall be afforded another opportunity to request costs of investigation. McCarthy v. State, 893 So.2d 689, 690 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED; in part; and REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., and TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taylor v. State, 242 So. 3d 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
-
Richards v. State, 258 So. 3d 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
-
Taylor v. State, 242 So. 3d 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cintron v. Martinez, 893 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)