MARTIN S. SAXON AND EUGENE ADDIS, APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND MICHAEL FOX, CHIEF OF POLICE, APPELLEES
MARTIN S. SAXON AND EUGENE ADDIS, APPELLANTS,
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND MICHAEL FOX, CHIEF OF POLICE, APPELLEES
113 So. 2d 727
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
This was an appeal from a final decree adverse to appellants, resulting from an action instituted by them for declaratory relief. We have considered the appellants’ assignments of error, the three questions raised by their brief, the record of the proceedings before the chancellor, as well as oral argument before this court, and conclude that the decree appealed from is without error and should be affirmed.
Affirmed.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Standard Jury Instructions-Contract & Bus. Cases, 116 So. 3d 284 (Fla. 2013)…y in its dealings, often with third parties, which were a proximate result of the breach, and which were reasonably foreseeable by the breaching party at the time of contracting.”) (citation and internal quotations omitted). 4. Lanzalotti v. Cohen, 113 So. 2d 727, 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959) (“Recovery may include special damages which are reasonably and necessarily incurred as a proximate result of the failure of the lessor or sublessor to perform his contract to make a lease or sublease, and such as should [*33…
-
Brewer v. Northgate OF Orlando, Inc., 143 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…the rent contracted to be paid and the actual rental value of the premises. Moses v. Antuono, 1908, 56 Fla. 499, 47 So. 925, 20 L.R.A.,N.S., 350; Hodges v. Fries, 1894, 34 Fla. 63, 15 So. 682. Also recognized in Lanzalotti v. Cohen, Fla.App., 1959, 113 So. 2d 727; and Young v. Cobbs, Fla.1959, 110 So. 2d 651, 71 A.L.R.2d 1100. The evidence in this case supports a finding that there was a difference in the contracted rent and rental value to the extent of a 25% increase over the contracted rent. This would a…
-
AVIS Rent A CAR Sys., Inc. v. Monroe Cnty., 660 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…he terms are ambiguous and are given meaning by the extrinsic evidence. J.M. Montgomery Roofing Co. v. Fred Howland, Inc., 98 So. 2d 484 (Fla.1957); Seaway Yacht Sales, Inc. v. Brunswick Corp., 242 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); Lanzalotti v. Cohen, 113 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 116 So. 2d 772 (Fla.1959). The concession agreement provides that Avis’s concession right is nonexclusive and is otherwise silent regarding the county’s right to grant further concessions. Used in this context, the term…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence