CLARENCE L. PEARCE, APPELLANT,
v.
BETTY PEARCE, APPELLEE
CLARENCE L. PEARCE, APPELLANT,
BETTY PEARCE, APPELLEE
113 So. 2d 771
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 19 cases
Opinion of the Court
It appearing that the appellant has failed to prosecute the appeal in this cause in accordance with the provisions of the Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A., it is, upon consideration,
Ordered by the Court sua sponte that the appeal in this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (19 total)
-
Kraemer v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 572 So. 2d 1363 (Fla. 1990)…rida2 and has been applied with very few exceptions.3 We are loath to engraft upon this doctrine a further exception that would have such far-reaching consequences. A lease is different from a conditional sales contract. See Cox Motor Co. v. Faber, 113 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959) (distinguishing a lease or bailment from a conditional sales contract). A sale has been consummated under a conditional [*1366] sales contract even though the vendor holds legal title as security for the payment of the purchase p…
-
Register v. Harris W. Redding, 126 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961)…d the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein. STURGIS, and CARROLL, DONALD, JJ., concur. . Palmer v. R. S. Evans, Jacksonville, Inc., Fla.1955, 81 So. 2d 635. . Cox Motor Company v. Faber, Fla.App. 1959, 113 So. 2d 771. . Smith v. City of Daytona Beach, Fla.App.1960, 121 So. 2d 440. . Barnett v. Butler, Fla.App.1959, 112 So. 2d 907, 909. . Hicks v. Land, Fla.App.1960, 117 So. 2d 11.…
-
Curr v. Helene Transp. Corp., 287 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)…ng Helene Transportation Corporation the owner of the taxicab (which is merely naked legal title) does not determine ownership in considering tort liability arising out of the operation of an automobile. See Cox Motor Company v. Faber, Fla.App.1959, 113 So. 2d 771. We note also that a review of the record revealed that in his deposition defendant Friedman testified that Yelmor Transportation, Inc. owned the subject vehicle. Therefore, we conclude that the trial judge abused his discretion in deleting defendan…
Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence