TED WILLIAMS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
TED WILLIAMS, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
113 So. 2d 833
Florida Supreme Court (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Because of a palpable and egregious violation of Florida Appellate Rule 3.14, subd. b, 31 F.S.A. providing that petitions for rehearing “must set forth concisely, and without argument, the alleged omissions, oversights, causes or grounds on which it is based” and pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.14, subd. d providing for the striking of such petition for a substantial violation of any material provision of the rule,
It Is Ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby stricken.
TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and HOBSON, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dayton v. State, 363 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)…t overlooked or misapprehended in its opinion or decision. This the appellant has failed to do. See concurring opinion on Petition for Rehearing in Petition of Post-Newsweek Stations, Florida, Inc., 359 So. 2d 1195 (Fla.1978). See Williams v. State, 113 So. 2d 833 (Fla.1959); Texas Co. v. Davidson, 76 Fla. 475, 80 So. 558 (1919); and State v. Green, 105 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). The petition for rehearing is stricken, sua sponte. Petition for rehearing is STRICKEN. CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.…
-
In re Petition of Post-Newsweek Stations, 359 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 1978)…s based” and pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.14 d. providing for the striking of such petition in the event of a substantial violation of any material provisions of the rule, I would strike the applications for rehearing. See Williams v. State, 113 So. 2d 833 (Fla.1959); Texas Co. v. Davidson, 76 Fla. 475, 80 So. 558 (1919), and State v. Green, 105 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). ENGLAND, C. J., concurs.…