MONA M. CUMBERLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court affirmed conviction for animal fighting but reversed the trial court's imposition of a $3,000 donation to the ASPCA as lacking statutory authority.
A trial court lacks statutory authority to order a defendant to donate money to the ASPCA as part of a sentence for animal fighting.
[1] A trial court lacks statutory authority to order a defendant to make a monetary donation to a charitable organization as part of a criminal sentence.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCumberland was arrested following an organized dogfight at her residence where law enforcement found two pit bulls actively fighting in a makeshift ri…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Authority For Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
Mona Cumberland appeals her conviction and sentence for one count of fighting and baiting animals under section 828.122(3), Florida Statutes (2014). The *953charge stemmed from an organized dogfight that occurred at a residence where Cumberland lived. On the night of Cumberland’s arrest, law enforcement entered the backyard of the residence and observed two pit bulls actively fighting in a makeshift fighting ring. Thirty-three dogs were taken from the property. Most of the animals were bleeding and had facial injuries. Additionally, paraphernalia found within the home and on the property was consistent with an organized dogfighting operation. Twenty-six people were arrested on the night of the incident.
Cumberland raises a number of issues on appeal, only one of which merits discussion. The trial court ordered Cumberland to pay $3000 to the ASPCA as part of her sentence. We reverse that portion of Cumberland’s sentence because “there is no statutory authority permitting the trial court to order ... a $3000 donation to the ASPCA,” and therefore imposing that requirement was improper. See Bell v. State, 216 So.3d 751, 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).
Accordingly, we affirm Cumberland’s conviction but reverse and remand for the trial court to strike the $3000 donation to the ASPCA from her sentence.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., PALMER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.