SOUTHEASTERN TELEPHONE COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
v.
ALAN S. BOYD, JERRY W. CARTER, AND WILBUR C. KING, AS MEMBERS OF AND CONSTITUTING FIORIDA RAILROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, AND CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, CITY OF VALPARAISO, CITY OF CRESTVIEW, CITY OF MADISON, CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, CITY OF GREENVILLE, AND CITY OF NICEVILLE, FIORIDA, RESPONDENTS
Because the petition for certiorari suggested potential jurisdiction we issued the writ and the matter has been heard on the question of jurisdiction as well as on the merits.
A careful study of the supporting record in the light of the well-prepared and illumi*2nating briefs leads us to the conclusion that the decision of the Court of Appeal does not collide with a prior decision of this Court on the same point of law. Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F. S.A.
Finding as we do that there is no point of conflict between the decision submitted for review and any prior decision of this Court on the same point of law, the writ must be and it is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
TERRELL, Acting C. J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ. concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kendall v. City OF Fort Pierce, 125 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)…e date upon which the Commission entered its order in the case ‘on rehearing granted.’ ” See also Central Truck Lines, Inc. v. Boyd, Fla.1958, 106 So. 2d 547, and Boyd v. Southeastern Telephone, Fla.App.1958, 105 So. 2d 889, certiorari denied Fla., 114 So. 2d 1. Among the many decisions from out of the state which support the general rule noted above, that in the absence of. express authority, a municipal civil service commission may not order a rehearing, are Skaggs v. Plorrall, 1948, 83 Cal.App.2d 424,…
-
Revell v. Fla. Dep't OF Labor & Emp. Sec., 371 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)…mployment. We pretermit consideration of this point because of our conclusion that procedural errors require that this cause be remanded for further hearing. In Boyd v. Southeastern Telephone Company, 105 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958), cert. dism. 114 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1959), this court adopted the principle that a quasi-judicial body has the power of its own motion or on request to correct or amend an order still under its control without notice or hearing to interested parties under certain conditions, thos…