BLACKBURN

v.

FLORIDA WEST COAST LAND & DEVELOPMENT CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Fitzgerald v. Cestari, 569 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1990)
  …e Co., 412 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1981); Peppermint Twist, Inc. v. Wright, 169 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1964); Canner v. Blank, 152 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1963); McCain v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co., 110 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3rd DCA), cert. denied, 114 So. 2d 3 (Fla.1959). . This claim must be analyzed as if the glass door were in compliance with the building code because it has already been determined that the Cestaris could not have discovered the lack of safety glass through a reasonable inspection. Fu…
• In re the Est. OF Daniel A. Udell, 482 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …identification. A general legacy has a prerequisite of designation by quantity or amount. The gift may be either of money or other personal property. Similarly, the court in In re Estate of Parker, 110 So. 2d 498, 500 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 114 So. 2d 3 (Fla.1959), said: A specific legacy is a gift by will of property which is particularly designated and which is to be satisfied only by the receipt of the particular property described. Income received during administration on property specifically…
• Robbins v. Hunyady, 498 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
  …An important factor in arriving at the settlor’s intent is the apparent scheme adopted by him for the disposition of his property as shown by the terms and provisions of his trust. In re Estate of Parker, 110 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 114 So. 2d 3 (Fla.1959). Here, the declaration of trust was carefully drawn in order to take advantage of the marital deduction. The construction urged by the children would preclude the husband’s estate from receiving this tax benefit. In Northern Trust Co. v.…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Blackburn v. Fla. W. Coast Land & Dev. Co., 109 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)