PETERSON METELLUS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PETERSON METELLUS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
229 So. 3d 827
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2017)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Martin v. State, 797 So.2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (Issues I, II, IV); Jackson v. State, 698 So.2d. 1299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (Issue III).
Warner, Levine, JJ., and Buchanan, Laurie E., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wheaton v. Mardella Wheaton, 261 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 2019)
-
Klaus Goersch and Brigitte Goersch v. City OF Satellite Beach, 252 So. 3d 309 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)…posite conclusions in Matte, 140 So. 3d at 690 (concluding strict compliance with rule 2.516 applies to section 57.105 motions that are served with required 21 day safe harbor notice but not filed with court), and McCoy v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 229 So. 3d 827, 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (concluding initial offer of judgment is outside email service requirements of Rule 2.516(a) ).…1 / 2
-
Oldcastle S. Grp., Inc. v. Railworks Track Sys., Inc., 235 So. 3d 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…courts as to whether a proposal for settlement .must be served as provided by rule 2.516. Compare Wheaton v. Wheaton, 217 So. 3d 125 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), rev. granted, 2017 WL 4785810 (Fla. October 24, 2017), with McCoy v. B.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 229 So. 3d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017), and Boatright v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 218 So. 3d 962 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). We adopt the view of McCoy and Boatright and hold that .compliance with rule 2.516 is not required when serving a proposal for settlement. We certify co…
Authorities Cited
- CAP Constr., Inc. v. TGSV Constr., Inc., 698 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
- Martin v. State, 797 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)