BISCAYNE TRUST COMPANY, ET AL.,
v.
GEORGE T. O'FERRELL
BISCAYNE TRUST COMPANY, ET AL.,
GEORGE T. O'FERRELL
113 Fla. 838
Florida Supreme Court (1934)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 152 So. 621
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
In this case a majority of the Court are of the opinion that the order appealed from falls within the purview of Therrell v. Howland, 108 Fla. 299, 146 Sou. Rep. 203 (6th headnote), and that, therefore, it should be reversed and remanded on authority of the opinion in that case.
Reversed and remanded.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Brown, J., disqualified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Franklyn S., Inc. v. Riesenbeck, 166 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…les clearly indicated that a motion for subpoena duces tecum could not be addressed to a party either at the time of taking his deposition or at the time of trial. See: Therrell v. Howland, 108 Fla. 299, 146 So. 203; Biscayne Trust Co. v. O’Ferrell, 113 Fla. 838, 152 So. 621; § 63.49 Fla.Stat., 1949 (Repealed); Rule 49, Florida Equity Rules, superseded by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 1954. The reasoning behind the rule was that it would enable a party to harass and annoy the opposing party if he were p…
Authorities Cited
- Therrell v. Howland, 108 Fla. 299 (Fla. 1933)