WILLIAM G. LUDWIG AND EMMA D. LUDWIG, D/B/A BROWN DUG BAR, APPELLANTS,
v.
H. G. COCHRAN, JR., AS DIRECTOR OF THA BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM G. LUDWIG AND EMMA D. LUDWIG, D/B/A BROWN DUG BAR, APPELLANTS,
H. G. COCHRAN, JR., AS DIRECTOR OF THA BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
114 So. 2d 484
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
This appeal was improvidently taken from a Circuit Court order denying a motion and a petition for certiorari directed to an order of the appellee as Director of *485the State Beverage Department. This Court, pursuant to Section 59.45, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which is applicable to District Courts of Appeal of Florida (Alliance for Conservation of Natural Resources in Pinellas County v. Furen, Fla.App., 104 So.2d 803; Wright v. Roller, Fla.App., 111 So.2d 485) regards the notice of appeal and the record herein as a petition for certiorari duly presented to this Court.
So considered, and finding ho error, cer-tiorari is denied.
WIGGINTON, C. J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Crepaldi v. Wagner, 128 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961)…ircuit court, in chancery, to determine the paternity of such child.” MS. Sec. 742.011, MS.A. . Rule 4.2, subd. a, MA.R., 31 E.S.A. . Rule 4.2. subd. b, MA.R. . Borras v. Allered, Fla.1952, 58 So. 2d 152. . Ludwig et al. v. Cochran, Ma.App.1959, 114 So. 2d 484; Everett v. Mann, Ma. App.1959, 113 So. 2d 758. . Rule 4.2, subd. b, E.A.R. . Local Lodge Number 1248 of International Association of Machinists et al. v. St. Regis Paper Company, Fla.App. 1960, 125 So. 2d 337.…
-
Otha Favors and Sharon Clinkenbeard Favors v. City OF Tampa, 246 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)…tutes, F.S.A. in perfecting their appeal. The writ is granted and the Order of Dismissal is quashed. This cause is therefore remanded for further consideration. PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and HOB-SON, JJ., concur. . Ludwig v. Cochran, Fla.App.1959, 114 So. 2d 484.…
-
Republic OF Cuba and Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Ritter, 130 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)…in common-law actions are limited to those orders relating to venue or jurisdiction over [*99] the person.1 As authorized by statute,2 we have treated the notice of appeal as a petition for common-law certiorari. See Ludwig v. Cochran, Fla.App.1959, 114 So. 2d 484; Kautzman v. Bandler, Fla.App.1960, 118 So. 2d 256. The burden of clearly demonstrating that the trial court has acted without and in excess of its jurisdiction or its rulings do not conform to the essential requirements of the law is upon the peti…
Authorities Cited
- The Alliance FOR Conservation OF Natural Res. IN Pinellas Cnty. v. Furen, 104 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)
- Wright v. Roller, 111 So. 2d 485 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)