ALBERTO DALVA MALZONE, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
ANDRES URIBE, ET AL., APPELLEES
ALBERTO DALVA MALZONE, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
ANDRES URIBE, ET AL., APPELLEES
232 So. 3d 1095
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2017)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Williams v. Miami-Dade Cty. Public Health Tr., 17 So.3d 859, 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion when its sanctions order was well-supported by the evidence); P.B. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 709 So.2d 590, 591 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“We do not consider the question of adequate notice because Appellants did not object to the lack of notice in the proceedings below or request a continuance. The first time they raised the issue was on appeal. By failing to object and by proceeding on the matter at the hearing, Appellants waived their objections to the lack of notice.).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Zenaida "Sandy" Martinez v. City of Lantana, 410 So. 3d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025)
-
Nichols v. City of Miami Beach (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
-
Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Miami Gardens Square One, Inc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
Authorities Cited
- P.B. and B.B. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 709 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- Williams v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Pub. Health Tr., 17 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)