ELISABETH GONZALEZ-CARONE, PETITIONER,
v.
IN RE: THE LANCE AND LINDA NEIBAUER JOINT TRUST, BY AND THROUGH LANCE NEIBAUER, AS TRUSTEE V. MICHAEL J. KURGAN, ETC., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because filed thirty-five days after the trial court's order, exceeding the thirty-day jurisdictional deadline under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c)(1).
A petition for writ of certiorari filed thirty-five days after rendition of the trial court's order is untimely and divests the appellate court of jurisdiction.
[1] The thirty-day filing deadline for a petition for writ of certiorari under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c)(1) is jurisdictional, and failure to file timely d…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the failure to timely invoke the jurisdiction of a reviewing court 'shall divest such court of jurisdiction to review such cause.'”
Explaining the jurisdictional consequence of missing the thirty-day deadline under Florida Statutes section 59.081(2).
Gonzalez-Carone sought certiorari review of a trial court's order denying her motion for protective order as moot, rendered on July 10, 2017. She file…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Protective Order cases and more on FLexlaw
Elisabeth Gonzalez-Carone seeks, by way of a petition for writ of certiorari, review of the trial court’s order denying her motion for protective order as moot, on August 14, 2017. The trial court’s order was rendered on July 10,2017. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure *11069.100(c)(1), a petition for certiorari “shall be filed within thirty days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.” The thirty day time period is jurisdictional. Under section 59.081(2), Florida Statutes (2017), the failure to timely invoke the jurisdiction of a reviewing court “shall divest such court of jurisdiction to review such cause.” See Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Fla. v. Lewis, 122 So.3d 504, 505-06 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (holding that because the petition for writ of certiorari was filed thirty-five days after rendition of the order to be reviewed, the petition is untimely and this Court is therefore without jurisdiction).
Here, Rule 9.100(c) required the instant petition to be filed within thirty days of the order rendered on July 10, 2017. Because the petition was filed on August 14, 2017, thirty-five days after rendition of the order sought to be reviewed, the petition is untimely. This Court therefore lacks jurisdiction over the petition. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Petition dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Miccosukee Tribe OF Indians OF Florida v. Lewis, 122 So. 3d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)