JOHN GEORGE WHITE AND CHRISTINE E. WHITE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
HERMAN B. WHITE, JR., AND HELEN R. WHITE HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1959-10-08
No. B-117
115 So. 2d 197 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1959) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Spleen v. Rogers Grp., Inc., 548 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …that he was not the aggressor in the altercation.” Id. (emphasis in the original). Rakestraw was followed by the Commission in several cases. In Williams v. Giffen Industries, Inc., 4 FCR 32, cert. den., [*743] Giffen Industries, Inc. v. Williams, 115 So. 2d 197 (Fla.1959), the employer argued that the claim was not compensable because the parties had a “cooling-off” period between altercations. The commission cited Rakestraw for its discussion of the “positional-risk” doctrine and distinguished the case at…
  • White v. White, 129 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961)
    …e finds a balance of $17,836.59 payable in annual instalments and a final in-stalment as hereinabove set out.” The decree was then appealed to this court and affirmed by per curiam order without opinion, as reported in White v. White, Fla.App.1959, 115 So. 2d 197. The second decree forming the background for the present suit is a final decree of divorce entered on January 7, 1960, in favor of the present appellee and against the said J. George White. The last two paragraphs of this divorce dqcree pertain to…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw